Skip to main content

Driven: 2018 Volkswagen Golf GTD



Hello petrolheads!

Today’s review is the Status Quo of the small hatchbacks: the Golf. You don’t even say Volkswagen, as surely even your nanny knows what a Golf is. So, instead of losing much time with presentations, let’s focus on what makes this Golf worth of a review: it’s (supposedly) a sports diesel.


Yes. A sports diesel. In other words, a diesel-powered hot hatch. Now, I once drove a diesel which could be called sporty – the SEAT Ibiza FR, powered by the iconic 1.9 TDI. That was the only turbocharged diesel I drove to date whose throttle response – within the torque band – rivaled that of a good, normally aspirated petrol. Applied on that small and light body, it made for an entertaining package, despite a ride as hard as its interior plastics…


But the Golf GTD is a totally different car. For starters, it’s way heavier. Then there’s the DSG gearbox. Finally, and most importantly, we have a diesel engine which must comply to strict environmental regulation and scrutiny, after the concept having undergone severe gunfire due to VW’s well-known diesel scandal.


So, what’s the result? 
There are two ways to analyse the Golf GTD: the first seeing it as a diesel-powered sporty hatchback, the second seeing as a sportier diesel, to someone who has no choice but to have one (high-mileage drivers).


Diesel-powered sporty hatchback
Observed on this perspective, the GTD DSG is, objectively, a poor car. 3 reasons: sound, handling and power delivery.


Sound: you can select a sports software configuration, which, between others, makes the car’s audio system play a synthesized-soundtrack over that of the engine. Great, if you drive with the windows closed all the time; not so great if you don’t. You know, the sound in the interior may be enhanced on this configuration, but on the outside nothing changes. Result: you drive around very smug because you assume people think, upon your presence, “hey, look that sexy car over there”; in reality, people may think “hey, the pizza delivery man is arriving, but I can’t see his van” instead. It rattles as badly as any modern diesel engine.


Handling: placing a 2-litre diesel engine on the nose of a small front-wheel drive car as the Golf, with the added burden of a heavy double-clutch gearbox just behind, completely changes the weight distribution over the chassis. Now, the electronics do a commendable work here as, given the circumstances – the test car even had atrociously bad tires – it’s not as bad as it could have been without those digital enhancements. But come into a corner, or roundabout, too fast and the car’s behavior is actually a bit disconcerting at first. The analogy I came up with to explain what it feels like is this: fill up a big bucket of water in half, pick it up, walk fast and then suddenly change direction. As the water crashes against the bucket’s wall, your trajectory change is momentarily halted, before the water moves on the opposite direction and suddenly you start turning again. In other words: you turn the steering wheel; the car starts to turn; moment abruptly builds up; the car suddenly runs wide; the electronics apply torque/ braking on individual wheels; the car starts turning again. On curvy Italian B-roads and Alpine roads the tires were actually the biggest constraint, but the uneven mass distribution is always well apparent in the form of lack of fluidity. And feedback for the controls does nothing to improve things, as everything is devoid of feel. The DSG gearbox is an additional source of frustration: at low speeds it’s jerky and dim-witted, and it’s slow to change cogs in rapid succession during sporty driving. Surely environmentally-friendly and reliability-securing software is the cause, as I’ve used way more responsive DSGs in the past.


Power delivery: this is the final nail in the coffin. Objectively, the GTD accelerates briskly to, say, 120 km/h (75 mph). Subjectively: it feels faster. The fastest way to accelerate is actually leaving the gearbox in automatic mode, as the programmers did a good job of exploring the resources – using the manual function you risk chasing the red-line, which is a loss of time as the engine doesn’t even like to reach 4k rpm. The rapid succession of (short) ratios being changed, plus the enhanced (loud) soundtrack makes one think warp speed has been reached… yet the speedo tells a different story.
Beyond these speeds, it’s a disappointment. It’s hard to believe the engine deploys 380Nm across a broad rev range, as instant power delivery wouldn’t impress the Pope. Having driven the 110kW/ 150PS version of the same engine on DSG- and manual gearbox-equipped, similar VW Tiguans, I feel compelled to partially blame the DSG for that lack of punch, as the manual Tiguan was not only more economical than the DSG-equipped twin, but also faster and way more responsive to the throttle, even if it had longer gear ratios (it’s a slick 6 speeder, unlike the DSG’s 7 ratios). The flappy paddles are a bit confusing to use as well, due to the large amount of ratios and because the engine never seems to be rotating at the best speed: below 2k revs it’s asleep, beyond 3,5k it runs out of breadth, in between one expects more punch…


Sportier Diesel
It fares way better under this perspective, but not as well as you might expect. As described before, the relatively narrow power band combined with that DSG gearbox make for a power delivery which I’m guessing doesn’t significantly better that of the manual gearbox-equipped, 110kW/ 150PS version to half of the extent one might imagine. Upon kick-down, it takes a couple of seconds between smashing the accelerator and something interesting happening, which makes sporadic, unpredictable bursts of acceleration downright slow. Only overtaking can get round that; as you know what’s going to happen, you can select the best gear beforehand and accelerate lightly just before the process begins, in order to already have the turbo under charge.
The other disappointment is fuel economy. Modern diesels can be extremely economical nowadays, especially during very long drives, but that certainly isn’t the case of this car. For example, on a 150km stretch of mostly de-restricted Autobahn, upon having been driven flat out for most of the time, it averaged 8,4 L/100km of diesel (34 UK mpg). True, it (slowly) displayed 230 km/h (143 mph) on its speedo, but on similar conditions, an Audi A4 Avant, featuring a turbocharged 2-litre petrol engine and four-wheel drive, manages averages below 11 L/100km (26 mpg). Remember the Audi is way bigger, heavier and much faster.
Following Austrian, Swiss and (partially) Italian speed limits, it never bettered 5 L/100km (57 UK mpg), normally displaying 5,5 L/100km (51 UK mpg).


Regarding the rest of the car, not a lot needs to be said. It’s beautifully put together, reasonably well equipped and noise insulation, especially at speed, is well suppressed. One detail worth mentioning is the thought put into the wing mirrors design, as even under downpours they barely got wet. Ride comfort is acceptable, especially if one acknowledges the tires are almost rubber bands – 18 inch wheels should improve things further. Like most modern LED lighting systems, the Golf’s LED headlights also proved to be as functional as good to look at.


All in all, Volkswagen has made what it can to keep alive its long-lived tradition of sportier diesels, dating back to the Eighties. But the world has moved on, and honestly, I don’t see much point on this car nowadays. It’s no real alternative to the balanced mid-range, 110kW/ 150PS version nor, especially, to the infinitely more poised GTI.
However, if for some reason, you do fancy this compromise, let me suggest avoiding the DSG gearbox; you save money, performance, fuel, emissions and, on the long term, reliability issues. And if there is something the VW Group still hasn’t forgot to make well, it’s sweet and precise manual gearboxes; trust me, it will make driving the GTD a bit more entertaining.


Verdict: Silvio Berlusconi on wheels: overpromising and underperforming.

Official vital data:
Engine and transmission:
1968 cc, turbocharged, direct injection, inline-4 cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder, steel (block) + aluminium (head) (Diesel)
184 PS (135 kW)/ 3500-4000 rpm
380 Nm/ 1750-3250 rpm
Red line: 4600 rpm
7-speed, dual clutch automatic transmission (DSG)

Dimensions and weights:
Length/ wheelbase/ width/ height: 4,268/ 2,626/ 1,79/ 1,482 metres
Turning circle: 10,9 metres

Weight: 1400 kg
Boot: 380/ 1270 litres (VDA, respectively with 5 and 2 seats available)
Fuel tank: 50 litres
Tires: 225/35R19, Minerva Frostrack UHP (Winter tires)

Performance:
Top speed: 230 km/h (143 mph), reached on 7th gear
0-100 km/h (0-62 mph): 7.4 seconds
Fuel consumption (NEDC, urban/extra-urban/average): 5.1/ 4.2/ 4.5 l/100km (55/ 67/ 62 UK mpg)
CO2 emissions: 118 g/km (Euro 6)

2000 rpm, 5th gear: 86 km/h (53 mph – display)
2000 rpm, 6th gear: 107 km/h (66 mph – display)
2000 rpm, 7th gear: 140 km/h (87 mph – display)

Main equipment: twin-zone climate control, twin front airbags, sidebags, windowbags, radio with Bluetooth connectivity, MP3-player and USB+AUX in, Sat Nav, multifunction steering wheel, faux leather steering wheel and gearbox knob, heated seats, cruise control, lane assist, automatic braking in the city, parking sensors, rear-view camera, drive lock, power steering, LED head and tail lights, (automated) dual clutch gearbox, 19” alloy wheels, rear tinted windows, ABS+ASR+ESP+hill holder.

German price in 2018: 30 000€.

Driven: 2 750 km (1 700 miles), May 2018; car left with 19 025 km (11 800 miles).

Rating: 13 out of 20

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Buying Guide: Smart Roadster and Roadster-Coupé

Hello Petrolheads! In today’s post, I decided to put down a comprehensive guide featuring all the points to look at while searching for a Smart Roadster, plus answering a few of the most regular questions I’m asked. Having first acquired a Roadster 9 years ago and nowadays owning two further units, and having read an awful lot about it, allowed me to have a very detailed idea about the strong and weak points of this Automotive pearl. So, considering buying a Smart Roadster? Congratulations! You’re on the way to a very fun life experience. But, to be so, you must do your homework first. -        Which production year? Generally speaking, I always advise people to avoid cars produced during the first production year . I’m a Mechanical Engineer specialized in vehicle development and production, so have a perfect insight about the topic. Without entering in details, let’s just say that rigid marketing milestones regularly imply a car coming to market without perfect pa

Driven: Smart Roadster Brabus Xclusive

Hello once again, petrolheads! It’s finally the time to review my latest acquisition: the Brabus tuned version of my beloved Smart Roadster. My passion for the Smart Roadster is well known and documented, but ever since I bought my first Roadster (the 60kW intermediate variant), I wondered: how much fun is the top of the range Brabus? I mean, with those looks it’s impossible to be something other than phenomenal, right? Sub-1,2m in height, 17” wheels with massive tires, leather-clad interior with aluminium touches and 19 horsepower more … It simply looks irresistible. The latest versions, called Xclusive, add a couple of touches to the standard Brabus, whose specification also changed with the appearance of this top equipment level (then it also appeared a cheaper, equipment-stripped Brabus Finale). However, despite prices starting at a hefty 27k € (in Germany), the options list was still long. For instance, not every single Brabus Xclusive Roadster I have seen has – wait

Driven: Mercedes-Benz C 220 CDI Elegance ('04 facelift)

Hello once again! The car I will be talking about in the next lines is the ’04 facelift, W203 Mercedes-Benz C 220 CDI, with Elegance trim. It was bought in August 2004, and I was the second person driving it. As another Mercedes-Benz was traded (a 1998 C 220 CDI, also in Elegance trim), I remember, back then, to think “ This is soooooo much better! It’s as easy to handle as my Rover!!! ” Really, as I was the last person to drive the old Mercedes, the difference was very obvious. Today, the very same car seems to have changed. No, the car is the same, apart being three years old and with almost 90k kilometres (56k miles) on the clock. As I have driven many sportier cars after that first drive, now, the first thing I notice, is the steering’s complete absence of feel. None at all, you have no idea of what’s going on with the front wheels. The brakes are also indirect, somehow, they do not transmit much confidence to me, and the gearbox is very easy to handle, has nice gearing ratios, but