Skip to main content

Driven: 2003 Smart Fortwo Passion W450


Cheers, petrolheads!

Today’s review regards the starting point of the Smart range: the very first generation Fortwo (aka City-Coupé), with a petrol engine and Passion equipment level.


The, then, City-Coupé, came to market in the end of 1998, the range comprising three equipment levels - City&Pure  (basic), City and Pulse (sportier) and City&Passion (more luxurious) - and two versions of the same engine, a self-denominated turbo-suprex (45 and 54 PS). First on selected European markets, expanding to most of Europe by the year 2000. By then, a Cabrio version was added to the range, as well as a diesel CDI version.


As everything revolutionary, market response was very cold. Prejudice was the dominant factor, not helped by the fact that it only took two. If it’s true that most people drive alone most of the time – Smart’s own studies had shown an average of 1.2 person per car in west Europe – it’s also correct to assume that most people need, sometimes, three or four seats. That made it more suitable as a second car, but it was relatively expensive. It cost about the same as a basic-spec small hatch, such as an Opel Corsa. So, the Smart’s market was reduced to relatively-wealthy, avant-garde cosmopolitan individuals. Not a broad one…


Now, almost 17 years later, things have changed. For better, that is.
I’ve seen Fortwos belonging to people living on the countryside, others being regularly used on long journeys and they’re taking smaller European cities and villages by storm, not to mention bigger ones. What changed in the meantime? Easy: it’s no longer unusual (remember the early prejudice?), prices on the used car market are more attractive and it won a good reputation for low running costs and high reliability.


I must confess I was never sold to the design quirkiness of the Fortwo. Even the facelifted version seemed to be missing something, unlike the Roadster, which was love at first sight – the reason for buying three Roadsters before this Fortwo…


This is a 2003 facelifted version. In the early production years, the model was technically upgraded almost yearly, but the first visual facelift happened in January 2002. The main differences were the headlights – the Coupé received the Cabrio’s version – and the rear light cluster of the coupé, with its sleeker three-rounded units. Finally, in January of 2003, the last major technical facelift happened. Engine displacement was enlarged to 698cc, noticeably improving torque and power. Because of the higher and broader torque delivery, it also became slightly more economical. Furthermore, the traction-control system Trust Plus was replaced by the advanced Electronic Stability Program (ESP), comprising ABS, traction control (ASR), electronic brake cornering force distribution (EBC), emergency brake assistance (BAS) and hill-start assist (Hill holder). Because of this safety artillery, which improved handling on extreme situations, the suspension was softened and given more spring travel, so the car became more compliant over bad surfaces – previously, the ride was reported to be very hard.


Driving a W450 – internal code name for the first generation – Fortwo is an extremely intriguing experience at first, as it has nothing in common with the “normal” cars. And for someone who’s used to that same steering wheel and gearbox lever on a completely different layout, it’s even slightly confusing. But I will go as far as saying this: it’s a riot to drive!


Access to the cabin is perfect, the only – minor – drawback being the very large doors, which require a lot of space to fully open and are hard to close the first time. The seating position is high, not much lower than in some modern SUVs, and visibility is excellent. The sensation of space is astonishing, as recurring comments like “I can’t believe it’s this big on the inside!” prove. The clever formula is a windscreen placed far away and a passenger seat a bit set back, allowing for occupant’s elbows not to touch. The glass roof helps this feeling even more.


In the city, maneuverability is very good, but the steering is flawed. Power steering was not available – it was optional equipment from this facelift on – and, to make steering reasonably light, two things were made: the front tires were made narrower than the rears, and the steering was given more lock. And this is the problem: yes, the turning radius is great, but the wheel turns almost two (!) complete times per side, from the straight ahead position! What that means is a lot of arm work inside the car, if the maximum maneuverability is to be exploited. In other words, it’s disappointingly indirect.


The gearbox is a bit hopeless if left in auto mode (softouch). Gear changes are jerky, even worse than on the Roadster, which, together with the soft suspension, make the car – and its passengers – roll forward and back. Better to use it manually, as the experience improves dramatically, and it will even suggest when to change up or down. It automatically changes up or down at inadequate engine speeds.


The small wheelbase makes road imperfections seem to be bigger (both axles hit them almost at the same time), but it never becomes uncomfortable. Parking is hard at first, because driver’s senses aren’t calibrated to the absence of a bonnet or to a back which is wider that the front – kerbing a rear wheel is usual – but, once knowing the car, it’s – literally – a laugh! Adding to the practicality is an interior full of (open) places to store stuff and a boot which is more than adequate for most people’s needs. The only places where to hide belongings are a small draw under the radio or under the seats, as even the boot luggage cover fails to completely hide the boot’s contents.


Naturally, on the open road and, especially, on the motorway, is where the Fortwo is less comfortable. The main problem are cross winds – the tall sides, small wheelbase and low weight allow wind to shake it abruptly, and it can be hard work to make smooth (read, straight) progress on a windy day. Cornering can also be interesting, both because of the limited grip provided by the front tires and because the front and rear axles never seem to be coordinated. Additionally, the total absence of feeling, and un-directness, of the steering makes steering corrections mid-corner common-place, while the soft suspension allows plenty of body roll, something the non-sport seats – which, by the way, are very comfortable – don’t mitigate with proper lateral support.


Even despite all of this (or maybe because of all this?), the truth is that this is a very fun car to drive. Unlike most (modern) cars, it’s a car which needs to be driven well in order to make smooth progress, and a deeply rewarding one when doing so. The engine sounds great and is very responsive, even providing decent acceleration on 6th gear (the speed limiter at 135 km/h can be felt). Fuel consumption could be better, I averaged ca. 5 l/100km (56 MPG UK) on the first 1500km (900 miles). Not as economical as the Roadsters 60kW, probably due to the need to push the accelerator harder for the same acceleration.


Finally, just like the Roadsters, it’s a car which grows on its owner a lot with time. It needs a (long) daily basis use in order to really show its many upsides, but what ultimately makes the Fortwo shine, is the way it makes its driver feel. It always reminds you you’re not just one more driving some vulgar dull box, but instead an individual questioning the Status Quo while having (a lot of) fun in the process. It totally justifies its “Open your Mind” slogan, the reason why the Smart brand has such a devoted fan base.

Verdict: being different has never been easier.


Official vital data:
Engine and transmission:
698 cc, inline-3 cylinder, 2 valves per cylinder (Otto)
61 PS (45 kW)/ 5250 rpm
95 Nm/ 2000-4000 rpm
Red line: 6300 rpm
6-speed automated manual transmission

Dimensions and weights:
Length/ width/ height: 2,500/ 1,515/ 1,549 metres
Turning circle: 8,7 metres
Weight: 805 kg (including 75 kg driver and all operating fluids, fuel tank 90 % full)
Boot: 150/ 260 litres (below cover/ until roof)
Fuel tank: 33 litres
Tires: 145/65R15 (front)/ 175/55R15 (rear), Continental ContiEcoContact EP

Performance:
Top speed: 135 km/h (85 mph), electronically limited, reached on 5th and 6th gears
0-100 km/h (0-62 mph): 15.5 seconds
Fuel consumption (NEDC, urban/extra-urban/average): 5.9/ 4.0/ 4.7 l/100km (47/ 70/ 60 UK mpg)
CO2 emissions: 113 g/km

Main equipment: air conditioning, twin front airbags, radio with CD player, 15” alloy wheels, ABS+ASR+ESP+hill holder, panoramic roof, alarm, leather steering wheel and gearbox knob, luggage cover, smoker pack, drive lock, remote central locking.

Portuguese price in 2003: 12 500€.

Driven: from December 2015; car left with 50 100 km (31 400 miles).


Rating: 17 out of 20

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Buying Guide: Smart Roadster and Roadster-Coupé

Hello Petrolheads! In today’s post, I decided to put down a comprehensive guide featuring all the points to look at while searching for a Smart Roadster, plus answering a few of the most regular questions I’m asked. Having first acquired a Roadster 9 years ago and nowadays owning two further units, and having read an awful lot about it, allowed me to have a very detailed idea about the strong and weak points of this Automotive pearl. So, considering buying a Smart Roadster? Congratulations! You’re on the way to a very fun life experience. But, to be so, you must do your homework first. -        Which production year? Generally speaking, I always advise people to avoid cars produced during the first production year . I’m a Mechanical Engineer specialized in vehicle development and production, so have a perfect insight about the topic. Without entering in details, let’s just say that rigid marketing milestones regularly imply a car coming to market without perfect pa

Driven: Smart Roadster Brabus Xclusive

Hello once again, petrolheads! It’s finally the time to review my latest acquisition: the Brabus tuned version of my beloved Smart Roadster. My passion for the Smart Roadster is well known and documented, but ever since I bought my first Roadster (the 60kW intermediate variant), I wondered: how much fun is the top of the range Brabus? I mean, with those looks it’s impossible to be something other than phenomenal, right? Sub-1,2m in height, 17” wheels with massive tires, leather-clad interior with aluminium touches and 19 horsepower more … It simply looks irresistible. The latest versions, called Xclusive, add a couple of touches to the standard Brabus, whose specification also changed with the appearance of this top equipment level (then it also appeared a cheaper, equipment-stripped Brabus Finale). However, despite prices starting at a hefty 27k € (in Germany), the options list was still long. For instance, not every single Brabus Xclusive Roadster I have seen has – wait

Driven: Mercedes-Benz C 220 CDI Elegance ('04 facelift)

Hello once again! The car I will be talking about in the next lines is the ’04 facelift, W203 Mercedes-Benz C 220 CDI, with Elegance trim. It was bought in August 2004, and I was the second person driving it. As another Mercedes-Benz was traded (a 1998 C 220 CDI, also in Elegance trim), I remember, back then, to think “ This is soooooo much better! It’s as easy to handle as my Rover!!! ” Really, as I was the last person to drive the old Mercedes, the difference was very obvious. Today, the very same car seems to have changed. No, the car is the same, apart being three years old and with almost 90k kilometres (56k miles) on the clock. As I have driven many sportier cars after that first drive, now, the first thing I notice, is the steering’s complete absence of feel. None at all, you have no idea of what’s going on with the front wheels. The brakes are also indirect, somehow, they do not transmit much confidence to me, and the gearbox is very easy to handle, has nice gearing ratios, but