Skip to main content

Driven: Smart Roadster-Coupé 60


Cheers, petrolheads!

This year’s first post regards, once again, the Smart Roadster. It has became some sort of tradition to start the year with such a post but, as last year this time, there are relevant news regarding my garage. I’m now the very proud owner of three Smart Roadsters, after just having added a Roadster-Coupé 60 to the collection!


I must confess that I bought it because of the attractive combination of price/ use/ configuration (and because I need a toy to drive on the Alps before I roll the Panda over…). I’m far from being the biggest admirer of the fastback rear, which many (most, from what I noticed until now) people argue make the car’s profile look svelter, while adding some practicality to the mix. But beauty is on the beholder’s eye, and to me, this version only works out if everything is black. The mix of many colours isn’t to my taste, and the fastback also makes the car look taller than the standard Roadster, so a bit less purposeful.


This unit represents the cheapest way of having a Roadster-Coupé. Standard equipment included air-con and wider wheels with a sportier design, 12-radius alloys, which are as gorgeous to look at as a nightmare to clean. It also lacks power steering, as my other Roadsters, so the great steering feel is the same.


So, straight to the driving dynamics. The direct comparison has to be made with the Roadster 60, and I’m sad to report that this version, with added rubber and weight, slightly loses the edge in comparison. Ride comfort is on a par because, while the wheels are wider, they retain the 15” diameter, but the wider rubber makes the car (even) noisier at speed (the bigger interior volume also helps on that), and together with the added weight – some 20kg for the rear-end window frame – make the car feel slightly slower. Despite being placed high-up in the back – remember the car is already rear-biased on its Roadster form – this frame doesn’t adversely affect the handling, or at least not noticeably.


The final downside is that, after 1300km of driving, fuel economy was 5,5 l/100km (51 mpg) – down from the 4,7 l/100km (60 mpg) I usually get on the standard Roadster 60, despite a similar driving pattern. I believe the wider, still original tires are mostly to blame, as the Brabus Roadster suffers from the same problem, so I’m already planning on buying a set of Smart Spinline alloys – the standard alloys on the Roadster 60 – to fit on the Coupé as well.


As many Roadster owners know and point out – such as Gordon Murray, the designer of both the McLaren F1 and the Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren – the Smart Roadster is way over-wheeled, and the cheapest and most practical way to get round this issue is to get a set of Spinline wheels, with 185/55R15 tires. This is the smaller tire dimension the Smart Roadster can legally have, and as these wheels were standard on the Roadster 60, the other versions don’t look that far from standard. But I bet it would be better still on even narrower tires, because as the Brabus showed me, wider rubber doesn’t solve the terminal understeer on tight bends, as the main cause is the lack of weight over the front axle.


So here we are. Three Roadsters now, not even on my wildest dreams I thought that would be possible, but the Smart Roadster showed me that you don’t need mega-money to drive something fun and a bit exotic. It’s a love or hate car though, and there’s no rational excuse for the haters, not even the gearbox. If you’re thinking about buying one, you just need to forget what you have heard and test-drive one with an open mind. Be warned though, as the car grows in you a lot with time, you may end up collecting them!


Verdict: the usual Roadster thrills with a bit of added common-sense.

Official vital data:
Engine and transmission:
698 cc, inline-3 cylinder, 2 valves per cylinder (Otto)
82 PS (60 kW)/ 5250 rpm
110 Nm/ 2250-4500 rpm
Red line: 6300 rpm
6-speed automated manual transmission

Dimensions and weights:
Length/ width/ height: 3,427/ 1,615 (1,656 inc. wing mirrors)/ 1,207 metres
Turning circle: 10,7 metres
Empty weight: 820 kg (measured, with ca. 5L of fuel on board)
Boot: 59+189 litres (front+rear)
Fuel tank: 35 litres
Tires: 205/50R15, Continental Premium Contact

Performance:
Top speed: 180 km/h (113 mph)
0-100 km/h (0-62 mph): 11.2 seconds
Fuel consumption (urban/extra-urban/average): 6.4/ 4.3/ 5.1 l/100km (44/ 66/ 55 UK mpg)
CO2 emissions: 122 g/km

3000 rpm, 5th gear: 80 km/h (50 mph)
3000 rpm, 6th gear: 105 km/h (66 mph)


Main equipment: air conditioning, twin front airbags, radio with CD player, 15” alloy wheels, ABS+ASR+ESP+hill holder, electric roof.

Portuguese price in 2004: 20 000€.

Driven: from December 2014; car left with 36 800 km (23 000 miles).


Rating: 17 out of 20

Comments

shades_of_grey said…
3 Smart Roadsters??? Now I can tell you´re a hardcore fan and I totally understand why. I bought mine on april 2005, it has no more than 27000kms and I intend to keep it for as long as I live. I only drive it on summer because of dreaded leakage issues, but when I do, I really don´t feel the need to think about any other sports car. We have a future classic for sure! I love my Smart Roadster!

Popular posts from this blog

Buying Guide: Smart Roadster and Roadster-Coupé

Hello Petrolheads! In today’s post, I decided to put down a comprehensive guide featuring all the points to look at while searching for a Smart Roadster, plus answering a few of the most regular questions I’m asked. Having first acquired a Roadster 9 years ago and nowadays owning two further units, and having read an awful lot about it, allowed me to have a very detailed idea about the strong and weak points of this Automotive pearl. So, considering buying a Smart Roadster? Congratulations! You’re on the way to a very fun life experience. But, to be so, you must do your homework first. -        Which production year? Generally speaking, I always advise people to avoid cars produced during the first production year . I’m a Mechanical Engineer specialized in vehicle development and production, so have a perfect insight about the topic. Without entering in details, let’s just say that rigid marketing milestones regularly imply a car coming to market without perfect pa

Driven: Smart Roadster Brabus Xclusive

Hello once again, petrolheads! It’s finally the time to review my latest acquisition: the Brabus tuned version of my beloved Smart Roadster. My passion for the Smart Roadster is well known and documented, but ever since I bought my first Roadster (the 60kW intermediate variant), I wondered: how much fun is the top of the range Brabus? I mean, with those looks it’s impossible to be something other than phenomenal, right? Sub-1,2m in height, 17” wheels with massive tires, leather-clad interior with aluminium touches and 19 horsepower more … It simply looks irresistible. The latest versions, called Xclusive, add a couple of touches to the standard Brabus, whose specification also changed with the appearance of this top equipment level (then it also appeared a cheaper, equipment-stripped Brabus Finale). However, despite prices starting at a hefty 27k € (in Germany), the options list was still long. For instance, not every single Brabus Xclusive Roadster I have seen has – wait

Driven: Mercedes-Benz C 220 CDI Elegance ('04 facelift)

Hello once again! The car I will be talking about in the next lines is the ’04 facelift, W203 Mercedes-Benz C 220 CDI, with Elegance trim. It was bought in August 2004, and I was the second person driving it. As another Mercedes-Benz was traded (a 1998 C 220 CDI, also in Elegance trim), I remember, back then, to think “ This is soooooo much better! It’s as easy to handle as my Rover!!! ” Really, as I was the last person to drive the old Mercedes, the difference was very obvious. Today, the very same car seems to have changed. No, the car is the same, apart being three years old and with almost 90k kilometres (56k miles) on the clock. As I have driven many sportier cars after that first drive, now, the first thing I notice, is the steering’s complete absence of feel. None at all, you have no idea of what’s going on with the front wheels. The brakes are also indirect, somehow, they do not transmit much confidence to me, and the gearbox is very easy to handle, has nice gearing ratios, but