Skip to main content

Driven: Seat Ibiza ST 1.2 Style (2012)


Welcome back, Pertolheads!

Today I return to the dreadful world of the rent-a-car Economy class. For those who don’t know what’s that, let me put it this way: it’s the class you’ll find yourself in if you book your flights using cheapflightcomparison.com.ru, in order to save 15€ (after 101 taxes). My case, basically.

The current Ibiza was launched a couple of years now, so in 2012 Seat presented a refreshed version. For the small, young (not very rich) families, the ST small Estate was unveiled in 2010, also undergoing the 2012 facelift. Being a little longer, it was possible to increase boot space to a very reasonable 430 litres, adding a lot of practicality in the meantime. There’s an upper (fully covered) shelf, accessible both from the boot or from the back seats, two small storage spaces at each side (fantastic if you go shopping and refuse to pay for bags), four lashing points on the boot floor and a 12V socket.

The interior is similar to the regular Ibiza Hatchback, so space is adequate for anyone under 1,9m tall, there are plenty of storage places, material quality is mediocre in most places but built quality is beyond reproach. This is one of the best equipped Ibizas I have driven, and I thought better equipped units would have greater areas of soft plastics and rubber, but no. It seems Volkswagen is still saving the best materials for Audi and VW itself…


What really lets this car down though, is ride comfort. Seat’s branding as a “young, sports carmaker” makes sense on, say, an Ibiza Cupra, but to apply a hard suspension on a family car is as daft as to go on vacation to Miami and then book the cheapest motel to save money. Some young fathers, and mothers also, may say “yes, but I’m still young and I want to enjoy the drive”, but there are (even) more bad news. Despite the hard suspension setup – and this unit even had small alloys with tall tyres – handling is decent of course, but as entertaining as cooking… if you don’t like to cook. Even so, the rear is always settled and the steering is accurate enough, even if it doesn’t provide any feedback. The remaining controls are typical VW: precise gear shift and long-travel but easy to modulate pedals.
A reference for the fact that high-speed stability on the Autobahn  is nothing to smile about, as the car is heavily unsettled by side wind.

This unit had the widely used, not at all acclaimed 1.2-litre 3-cylinder petrol engine. I’ve been extremely critical of this engine before, on the old (pre-2010) Polo and Ibiza it really was an example of what an engine shouldn’t be. Pathetic performance, absurd fuel consumption and an electric-motor-like engine note made it as recommendable as a headache, leave alone a very low reliability index.
After 2010, things have changed, sort of. It now produces 5 hp more than before (70 in total), but the obvious gain in performance leave me in doubt that the difference is so small. It’s now way more eager, it lost the horrid electro-motor noise and remains as quiet as before when not working very hard. Gear ratios are way longer too, so fuel economy rose noticeably at speed. Mind you, it’s still very thirsty both on the city and on the Autobahn, easily averaging 8 l/100km (35 mpg) in both situations. On some fast trips on the Autobahn, I even managed to burn just shy of 10 l/100km (28 mpg), but that said, I saw 200 km/h on the speedo for a couple of times, while going downhill, with rpm to spare. That’s how long the gear ratios are. So, while still not being an economical engine, it isn’t shocking anymore either. Let’s say it’s enough for driving around town and on the open road, if the car travels unloaded. The thing is, estate cars tend to be full of people and their respective belongings, and I’m afraid that on these situations, this engine is not enough. But as VW’s TSI engines go mad drinking petrol without the lightest of throttles, I would recommend a 1.6 TDI instead, it’s effortless mid-range diesel punch more at home in such a car.

Verdict: an adequate estate car for the city commutes. Practical, good looking and cheap to buy and run. Flawed for everything else.

Vital data:

Engine and transmission:
1198 cc, inline-3 cylinder, 4 valves per cylinder (petrol)
70 PS (51.5 kW)/ 5400 rpm
112 Nm/ 3000 rpm
Red line: 6000 rpm
5-speed manual transmission

Dimensions and weights:
Length/ width/ height: 4,236/ 1,693/ 1,445 metres
Turning circle: - metres
Empty weight: 1110 kg
Boot: 430 litres (5 seats)
Fuel tank: 45 litres
Tires: 185/60 R15


Official performance:
Top speed: 163 km/h (101 mph)
0-100 km/h (0-62 mph): 14.6 seconds
Fuel consumption (urban/extra-urban/average): 7.3/ 4.5/ 5.5 l/100km (39/ 63/ 51 UK mpg)
CO2 emissions: 132 g/km

3000 rpm, 5th gear: 104 km/h (65 mph) – GPS reading (shown: 112 km/h – 70 mph)


Main equipment: climate control, twin front and side airbags, radio with MP3 player and aux-in socket, bluetooth connectivity, trip computer, 15” alloy wheels, ABS+ASR+ESP, heated front seats, cruise control, electric wing mirrors adjustment, chrome roof bars.

German price in 2012: 15 500€.

Driven: March-April 2013, 3200 km (2000 miles); car left with 18 650 km (11 656 miles).

Rating: 13 out of 20





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Buying Guide: Smart Roadster and Roadster-Coupé

Hello Petrolheads! In today’s post, I decided to put down a comprehensive guide featuring all the points to look at while searching for a Smart Roadster, plus answering a few of the most regular questions I’m asked. Having first acquired a Roadster 9 years ago and nowadays owning two further units, and having read an awful lot about it, allowed me to have a very detailed idea about the strong and weak points of this Automotive pearl. So, considering buying a Smart Roadster? Congratulations! You’re on the way to a very fun life experience. But, to be so, you must do your homework first. -        Which production year? Generally speaking, I always advise people to avoid cars produced during the first production year . I’m a Mechanical Engineer specialized in vehicle development and production, so have a perfect insight about the topic. Without entering in details, let’s just say that rigid marketing milestones regularly imply a car coming to market without perfect pa

Driven: Smart Roadster Brabus Xclusive

Hello once again, petrolheads! It’s finally the time to review my latest acquisition: the Brabus tuned version of my beloved Smart Roadster. My passion for the Smart Roadster is well known and documented, but ever since I bought my first Roadster (the 60kW intermediate variant), I wondered: how much fun is the top of the range Brabus? I mean, with those looks it’s impossible to be something other than phenomenal, right? Sub-1,2m in height, 17” wheels with massive tires, leather-clad interior with aluminium touches and 19 horsepower more … It simply looks irresistible. The latest versions, called Xclusive, add a couple of touches to the standard Brabus, whose specification also changed with the appearance of this top equipment level (then it also appeared a cheaper, equipment-stripped Brabus Finale). However, despite prices starting at a hefty 27k € (in Germany), the options list was still long. For instance, not every single Brabus Xclusive Roadster I have seen has – wait

Driven: Mercedes-Benz C 220 CDI Elegance ('04 facelift)

Hello once again! The car I will be talking about in the next lines is the ’04 facelift, W203 Mercedes-Benz C 220 CDI, with Elegance trim. It was bought in August 2004, and I was the second person driving it. As another Mercedes-Benz was traded (a 1998 C 220 CDI, also in Elegance trim), I remember, back then, to think “ This is soooooo much better! It’s as easy to handle as my Rover!!! ” Really, as I was the last person to drive the old Mercedes, the difference was very obvious. Today, the very same car seems to have changed. No, the car is the same, apart being three years old and with almost 90k kilometres (56k miles) on the clock. As I have driven many sportier cars after that first drive, now, the first thing I notice, is the steering’s complete absence of feel. None at all, you have no idea of what’s going on with the front wheels. The brakes are also indirect, somehow, they do not transmit much confidence to me, and the gearbox is very easy to handle, has nice gearing ratios, but