Today
I return to the dreadful world of the rent-a-car Economy class. For those who don’t
know what’s that, let me put it this way: it’s the class you’ll find yourself
in if you book your flights using cheapflightcomparison.com.ru, in order to
save 15€ (after 101 taxes). My case, basically.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1195f/1195ff2a7ce9e10a54b5112923e5a86574f88c31" alt=""
The
interior is similar to the regular Ibiza Hatchback, so space is adequate for
anyone under 1,9m tall, there are plenty of storage places, material quality is
mediocre in most places but built quality is beyond reproach. This is one of
the best equipped Ibizas I have driven, and I thought better equipped units
would have greater areas of soft plastics and rubber, but no. It seems
Volkswagen is still saving the best materials for Audi and VW itself…
What
really lets this car down though, is ride comfort. Seat’s branding as a “young,
sports carmaker” makes sense on, say, an Ibiza Cupra, but to apply a hard
suspension on a family car is as daft as to go on vacation to Miami and then
book the cheapest motel to save money. Some young fathers, and mothers also,
may say “yes, but I’m still young and I want to enjoy the drive”, but there are
(even) more bad news. Despite the hard suspension setup – and this unit even
had small alloys with tall tyres – handling is decent of course, but as
entertaining as cooking… if you don’t like to cook. Even so, the rear is always
settled and the steering is accurate enough, even if it doesn’t provide any
feedback. The remaining controls are typical VW: precise gear shift and
long-travel but easy to modulate pedals.
A
reference for the fact that high-speed stability on the Autobahn is nothing to smile about, as the car is
heavily unsettled by side wind.
This
unit had the widely used, not at all acclaimed 1.2-litre 3-cylinder petrol
engine. I’ve been extremely critical of this engine before, on the old
(pre-2010) Polo and Ibiza it really was an example of what an engine shouldn’t
be. Pathetic performance, absurd fuel consumption and an electric-motor-like
engine note made it as recommendable as a headache, leave alone a very low
reliability index.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d944/5d9448f7c1d08e141a3f2d99a0c070d478e41f01" alt=""
Verdict:
an adequate estate car for the city commutes. Practical, good looking and cheap
to buy and run. Flawed for everything else.
Vital data:
Engine
and transmission:
1198
cc, inline-3 cylinder, 4 valves per cylinder (petrol)
70
PS (51.5 kW)/ 5400 rpm
112
Nm/ 3000 rpm
Red
line: 6000 rpm
5-speed
manual transmission
Dimensions
and weights:
Length/
width/ height: 4,236/ 1,693/ 1,445 metres
Turning
circle: - metres
Empty
weight: 1110 kg
Boot:
430 litres (5 seats)
Fuel
tank: 45 litres
Tires:
185/60 R15
Official
performance:
Top
speed: 163 km/h (101 mph)
0-100
km/h (0-62 mph): 14.6 seconds
Fuel
consumption (urban/extra-urban/average): 7.3/ 4.5/ 5.5 l/100km (39/ 63/ 51 UK mpg)
CO2
emissions: 132 g/km
3000
rpm, 5th gear: 104 km/h (65 mph) – GPS reading (shown: 112 km/h – 70
mph)
Main
equipment: climate control, twin front and side airbags, radio with MP3 player
and aux-in socket, bluetooth connectivity, trip computer, 15” alloy wheels, ABS+ASR+ESP,
heated front seats, cruise control, electric wing mirrors adjustment, chrome
roof bars.
German
price in 2012: 15 500€.
Driven:
March-April 2013, 3200 km (2000 miles); car left with 18 650 km (11 656 miles).
Rating: 13 out of 20
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09673/096730c05a2ae0fa02feb8855955d0160042cc16" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce57f/ce57ff4b71d60cc1d0d6b8ebe5278016dde4fd88" alt=""
Comments