Skip to main content

Driven: Jeep Grand Cherokee V6 CRD Laredo



Driven: Jeep Grand Cherokee V6 CRD Laredo

Hello once again!

Today’s review is all about the 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee, in Laredo trim, with the brilliant Mercedes-Benz V6, 3 litre, diesel engine. And, for me, that’s what this car is all about: the engine.

It’s a pretty nice car. It’s lines are an evolution of the former model, especially the back. It’s not an elegant car, though. It’s more dynamic, even aggressive.
I think the 2001 Grand Cherokee, in Limited trim, was the best looking SUV until that date. Even today, there is not a single SUV that makes me look at it as that one did, when it was first launched. It was beautiful, and even the Mercedes-Benz M-Class does not impress me all-round as that car did. But that’s only a matter of taste, and I’m suspect, because I don’t like SUVs. That’s the reason why I have no proper photos of it, even if I drive it quite many times…

Really, I don’t see the point. Who, in this world, would take a 60+ thousand euro car off-road? “Oh no, I will scratch the metallic paint!” Please, if someone really needs to off-road, and does dirt work, it’s better to buy a pick-up (there are some quite nice ones, now…) and a proper car.

But now you say “what if I want to off-road in luxury?” Well, this is not the car for you. The Limited trim only adds some “chrome” bits and a bit more equipment, so, it’s only about the looks. But general interior quality is very poor on both trim levels. Unbelievable for a car of this status, it’s even worse than the mentioned 2001 MY. There are cheap plastics everywhere, hard, cheap looking, grey plastics. Similar to those from a ’97 Hyundai Accent, and not any better.

At least, standard equipment is not as bad. There is sat-nav, a nice sound system, electric seats, air con, airbags everywhere, ESP, plenty of cup-holders and a lot of storage spaces. It’s a functional, roomy interior, and, even if plastics are bad, at least they are properly put together.

But the best thing, as I said earlier, is the engine. Turning the ignition on, and the diesel V6 comes to life with an ultra-soft noise. A shame that, before you listen to it, you have to listen two-million ridiculous warning noises, reminding its American origins. You have a beep when you put the key on the ignition. Another one before you switch the engine on, and another when you select reverse. And yet another one, until you put the seat belt on…

The automatic gearbox, on the other hand, is another high point. It shifts seamlessly, with almost imperceptible, smart changes. It is a bit slow, truth be told, especially when using kick-down function, or changing from “R” to “D”, and vice-versa. And its manual mode is not convincing, either. It is neither practical nor pleasant, and the only point I see for its use, is while anticipating an overtaking maneuver, to avoid the lapse of time the kick-down takes.

Despite that initial lapse of time, overtaking is a safe task: all you need is to “smash” the accelerator, the gearbox will change from, say, 5th to 3rd, and off you go. With 510 Nm of torque, it is unbelievable how this heavy-weight car can accelerate. Even with no kickdown, the gearbox always keeps the engine above 1600 rpm, where you start to find most torque, so there are always enough power reserves. And what’s more, the short gear ratios also favor acceleration.
The price to pay is heavy fuel consumption: while driving at open road, with little accelerator movements, it is possible to burn only 8,5 l/100km (27,7 mpg), at around 100 km/h (62 mph). For around 120 km/h (75 mph), in the same conditions, it burns around 11 l/100 km (21,4 mpg). About the same as in urban traffic, with ultra-careful accelerations.
Trouble is, you have to concentrate very hard to do so. As the engine is so responsive, and also sounds nice, it is a joy to do short sprints at the lights, and the same applies to open-road driving, if kickdown is often used. It corners almost like a normal saloon, with no drama at all. But there is a lot of weight to carry, and the price to pay is that fuel consumption rises up to 50% in all those conditions…

So, a car I like mainly because of the engine. Pretty much as my brother’s Seat Ibiza Sport, with 130 hp, which I will review later.

Verdict: A useless car with a very nice engine. Practical, unrefined, big and heavy: We, Europeans, only need the practical part.


Vital statistics (portuguese version):

Engine:
2987 cc, V6, 4 valves per cylinder, turbo (Diesel)
218 hp/4000 rpm
510 Nm/1600-2800 rpm

Dimensions and weights:
Empty weight: 2100 kg
Boot: 979 litres (up to the roof)
Petrol tank: 77 litres

Official performance:
Top speed: 200 km/h (124 mph)
0-100 km/h (0-62 mph): 9,0 seconds
Fuel consumption (urban/extra-urban/average): 13,1/8,6/10,2 l/100km (18/27,4/23,1 mpg)
2000 rpm, 5th gear: 95 km/h (59 mph)
3000 rpm, 5th gear: 140 km/h (88 mph)
Red line: 4500 rpm
5-speed automatic gearbox, with tiptronic
Price in 2006: 60+k €
Driven: 2006 – today

Rate: 13 out of 20

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Buying Guide: Smart Roadster and Roadster-Coupé

Hello Petrolheads! In today’s post, I decided to put down a comprehensive guide featuring all the points to look at while searching for a Smart Roadster, plus answering a few of the most regular questions I’m asked. Having first acquired a Roadster 9 years ago and nowadays owning two further units, and having read an awful lot about it, allowed me to have a very detailed idea about the strong and weak points of this Automotive pearl. So, considering buying a Smart Roadster? Congratulations! You’re on the way to a very fun life experience. But, to be so, you must do your homework first. -        Which production year? Generally speaking, I always advise people to avoid cars produced during the first production year . I’m a Mechanical Engineer specialized in vehicle development and production, so have a perfect insight about the topic. Without entering in details, let’s just say that rigid marketing milestones regularly imply a car coming...

Driven: Mercedes-Benz CL 55 AMG Kompressor (2003 C215)

  Hello Petrolheads!   In the last post , I introduced you the Mercedes-Benz CL, generation C215 (1999-2006). The reason being, back in 2017, I got myself one such example, powered by AMG’s superlative 5,5-litre, supercharged V8.   Being a fan of the exquisite design since day one, this is one of those cars which, upon market introduction, for the vast majority of teenagers (myself included), goes into dreamland as fast as it accelerates to one hundred. Or, at best, into the bedroom wall… in the form of a poster. Eighteen years later, when the opportunity to acquire and enjoy one arose, it felt weird, actually. What about test-driving and actually buying it? Apprehension was, definitely, the strongest feeling. If you find yourself in the same situation, thinking whether or not you should play such a high card, I can’t urge you enough: do it! If you do your homework and find The One, I promise you, it will be a very special moment in your life! In this case we are ...

Driven: 2003 Smart Fortwo Passion W450

Cheers, petrolheads! Today’s review regards the starting point of the Smart range: the very first generation Fortwo (aka City-Coupé), with a petrol engine and Passion equipment level. The, then, City-Coupé, came to market in the end of 1998, the range comprising three equipment levels - City&Pure  (basic), City and Pulse (sportier) and City&Passion (more luxurious) - and two versions of the same engine, a self-denominated turbo-suprex (45 and 54 PS). First on selected European markets, expanding to most of Europe by the year 2000. By then, a Cabrio version was added to the range, as well as a diesel CDI version. As everything revolutionary, market response was very cold. Prejudice was the dominant factor, not helped by the fact that it only took two. If it’s true that most people drive alone most of the time – Smart’s own studies had shown an average of 1.2 person per car in west Europe – it’s also correct to assume that most people need, sometimes,...